Legal Opinion

Jay v. Jay

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 21, 1965No. 3724PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MYERS, Associate Judge.

Following trial, a judgment was entered on May 27, 1964, granting appellant husband an absolute divorce from appellee wife on the ground of her adulterous relationship with a known co-respondent. Custody of a minor child (about nine years of age) was awarded to the wife, together with maintenance and support for the child, but, as a condition of such custody, it was provided that appellee was “not to allow [co-respondent] in her living quarters, nor [was she] to visit the living quarters of [co-respondent],” and should she violate these conditions she would forfeit her…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Loughran v. LoughranSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Cook v. CookCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  3. Oliver v. OliverCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  4. Townsend v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  5. Lee v. LeeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Copeland v. StoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Copeland v. StoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Rzeszotarski v. RzeszotarskiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Rzeszotarski v. RzeszotarskiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API