Legal Opinion
Bear Stearns Investment Products, Inc. v. Hitachi Automotive Products (USA), Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 4, 2009No. 06 cv 1531KCM)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
McMAHON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Bear Stearns Investment Products, Inc. (“Bear Stearns”) brought this action against Hitachi Automotive Products (USA), Inc. (“HAP”) and Tokico (USA), Inc. (“Tokico”) (collectively, “Hitachi”) alleging (i) breach of contract and (ii) breach of the obligation to negotiate in good faith. Before this Court are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- R.G. Group, Inc., and R.G. Restaurant Associates v. The Horn & Hardart Company, and Bojangles' of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Scotto v. AlmenasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Transcience Corp. v. Big Time Toys, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- National Gear & Piston, Inc. v. Cummins Power Systems, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Bader v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Sawabeh Information Services Co. v. BrodyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Whitehurst v. 230 Fifth, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.