Legal Opinion

Pandya v. Hoerchler

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 29, 1993No. 1-90-3215PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cerda

Plaintiff, Raj Pandya, appeals from the entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants, David Hoerchler and Velsicol Chemical Corporation. Plaintiff argues that there was a genuine issue of material fact precluding summary judgment on count I for defamation and that the trial court improperly struck one paragraph of plaintiff s counteraffidavit in opposition to summary judgment. We affirm.

Count I of plaintiff’s amended complaint was captioned defamation and alleged the following. Plaintiff was an employee of Velsicol, which was a corporation engaged in the business of manufacturing and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kimbrough v. Jewel Companies, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. Van's Material Co. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Lindenmier v. City of RockfordAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. Krasinski v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Beauvoir v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical CenterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Vickers v. Abbott LaboratoriesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  2. McGreal v. AT & T Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
  3. Geske & Sons, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, and International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150, Afl-Cio, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  4. Dawson v. New York Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  5. Salem Mills, Inc. v. Wisconsin Tool & Stamping Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API