Legal Opinion

In Re Shamy

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 21, 1971PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In March 1971 the respondents George J. Shamy and his law partner Jack Pincus were ordered to show cause why they should not be suspended from the practice of law pending the determination of disciplinary proceedings grounded on alleged violations by them of the canons of ethics and the rules of court. Thereafter Shamy was suspended effective July 31, 1971 and until further order of this Court, and the matter was referred to Superior Court Judge Gerofsky with plenary power to act as an Ethics Committee. Answers to the charges against them were filed by the respondents, hearings were held…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re HowellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re RabbSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  2. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  3. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  4. Matter of FleischerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  5. Matter of FleischerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API