Klein v. G. F. C. Corp.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1DissentPearson, Judge
The first conclusion of the majority opinion is that the judgment of the trial court was correct on the question of possession. In this conclusion I concur; although, I do not find that the limited jurisdiction of the civil court of record is in any manner concerned with that conclusion. In addition it should be pointed out that a proper equitable defense may be made by a purchaser in default on a retain title contract. See Ragsdale v. Miami Cadillac Co., 88 Fla. 302, 102 So. 494.
Upon this second question, “(2) was it error to enter a summary judgment for the value of an automobile in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wiltcher v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1910
- Malsby v. GambleSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
- Brundage v. O'berry, Jr.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Ex Parte WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Ragsdale v. Miami Cadillac Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1924