Legal Opinion

Ragsdale v. Miami Cadillac Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 6, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, P. J.

The bill of complaint herein in effect alleges that a Writ of Replevin has been issued and served on complainant for an automobile worth $2,000.00, bought from defendant on the purchase price of which a balance of $300.08 and “a small amount of interest” are due and unpaid. The bill alleges that the contract of sale contains among others the following provisions:

“Title to said property shall not pass to the purchaser until said amount is fully paid in cash.”
“If the purchaser default in complying with the terms hereof, the seller may take immediate possession of said property, including any…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. G.F.C. Corporation v. SpradlinSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
  2. Klein v. G. F. C. Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  3. Malone v. MeresSupreme Court of Florida · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API