Legal Opinion

Pollard & Bagby, Inc. v. Morton G. Thalhimer, Inc.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 13, 1938PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

This is a suit brought by one real estate agent against another to compel division of commissions on the sale of a home near Richmond.

The issue, in short form, is this: Plaintiff, Morton G. Thalhimer, Incorporated, contends that it had a customer, Dr. C. C. Coleman, who desired to purchase a home, and that the defendant, Pollard & Bagby, Incorporated, had for sale a home known in the record as the “Finlayson Home”; that these two corporations, working through their respec*532tive agents, Lester D. Waller stein and C. I. Arnall, agreed to pool their efforts and to divide commissions if a sale to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. American Process Co. v. Florida White Pressed Brick Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1908
  3. Horne v. HolleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1936
  4. Frederickson v. NyeOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Richmond Union Passenger Railway Co. v. New York & Sea Beach Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1897

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jennings v. Realty Developers, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1970
  2. X-It Products, LLC v. Walter Kidde Portable Equipment, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2002
  3. Brockenbrough v. Taylor (In Re Taylor)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1985
  4. Jones v. Galleher & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  5. First National Bank v. PressleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API