Legal Opinion
Mendoza v. Inslee
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided March 17, 2020No. 3:19-cv-06216Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 CRISTINA MENDOZA, et al., CASE NO. 3:19-cv-06216-BHS 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER STRIKING PROPOSED 12 v. COMPLAINT AND RENOTING IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION 13 JAY INSLEE, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) has been referred to the 17 undersigned pursuant to Amended General Order 02-19. The matter is before the Court on 18 plaintiff’s amended proposed complaint in support of her IFP application. See Dkt. 3. 19 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, seeks to bring…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.