Commonwealth v. DeLuca
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McDERMOTT1, Justice.
The appellee, Ronald DeLuca, was found guilty of disorderly conduct following a bench trial, and a fine of $50.00 and costs were imposed. On appeal, the Superior Court reversed the judgment of sentence holding that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to support a conviction under the statute. 388 Pa. Super. 661, 560 A.2d 238.
The Commonwealth filed a petition for allowance of appeal which we granted to examine the issue of whether the Commonwealth proved that appellee’s words and actions would be considered disorderly conduct under the relevant statute.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GriscavageSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. HarperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
3Cited by12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LutesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. MaerzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. GilbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Diener v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Commonwealth v. BeattieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.