Legal Opinion

Municipality of Cayey v. Ormaechea

District Court, D. Puerto Rico

Decided November 18, 1916No. 981Published

1Opinion of the Court

HAMILTON, Judge,

delivered tbe following opinion:

The question comes up whether the case has been properly *208removed and whether there is any ground for remanding it. It is governed by § 29 of the Judicial Code of the United States [36 Stat. at L. 1095, chap. 231, Comp. Stat. 1916, §. 1011] and subsequent sections, providing for remands in proper cases.

As I understand the facts, the petition or original pleading in this case was filed May 15, and, under the law, the defendant would have until May 29 to answer. On May 26, before the time expired, a stipulation was entered into, as follows:

Come now…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad v. DaughtrySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. St. Paul & Chicago Railway Co. v. McLeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Donald v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Daugherty v. Western Union Tel. Co.District Court, D. Indiana · 1894

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API