Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Clinton

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1990No. C-8847PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAUZY, Justice.

This mandamus proceeding is unusual because it is filed by the plaintiffs and the defendant in the underlying suit. Relators Keith Dennis Rogers, Stacy Rogers, and Joe Taylor Sams seek a writ of mandamus directing the trial judge to vacate his order granting a new trial. We conditionally grant the writ.

Keith Rogers was injured in a one-car accident in Lubbock County in April 1987. The driver of the car was Joe Sams. Keith and his wife, Stacy, retained an attorney who, prior to filing suit against Sams, offered to settle with Sams’ insurer, Truck Insurance Exchange (TIE),…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stearnes v. ClintonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. Greenberg v. BrookshireTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Shadowbrook Apartments v. Abu-AhmadTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. McCormack v. GuillotTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Buttery v. BettsTexas Supreme Court · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. In Re J.O.A.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Esty v. Beal Bank S.S.B., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
  3. in Re State of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Rittenhouse v. Sabine Valley Center Foundation, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
  5. in the Interest of J.O.A., T.J.A.M., T.J.M., and C.T.M., ChildrenTexas Supreme Court · 2009

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API