Legal Opinion

Stone v. City and County of San Francisco

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 14, 1990No. C-87-4326-MHPPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PATEL, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Lester Stone, filed an action against defendants, the City and County of San Francisco (“CCSF”) alleging state tort claims and violations of his constitutional rights guaranteed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. After removing this case to federal court, defendants moved for dismissal on the ground that plaintiff’s claims were barred by the applicable statute of limitations. The court determined the applicable statute of limitations and denied the motion without prejudice, ordering further briefing on the issue of equitable tolling. Because both parties’…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Javor v. TaggartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. McMahon v. Albany Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Dowell v. Contra Costa CountyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
  4. Hood v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1992
  5. Reese v. City of Emeryville Fire DepartmentDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API