Hunneman & Co. v. LoPresti
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtHennessey, C.J.
The plaintiffs in these two cases are brokers who are suing the prior owners of the Delegate North apartment complex (Delegate North) for recovery of a real estate commission.3 The cases involve identical facts and were consolidated for decision in the Superior Court. The judge granted the plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment, and the defendants appealed. We transferred the cases to this court on our own motion. We conclude, based on our decision in Capezzuto v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co., ante 399 (1985), that the plaintiffs are not entitled to a commission, and therefore we…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tristram's Landing, Inc. v. WaitMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Quintin Vespa Co. Inc. v. Construction Service Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Mishara Construction Co. v. Transit-Mixed Concrete Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Ravage v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bump v. RobbinsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
- Sparks v. Fidelity National Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Plymouth Port, Inc. v. SmithMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
- Currier v. KosinskiMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
- Coldwell Banker/Hunneman v. ShostackMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.