Kelly v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSEN, Chief Judge.
These habeas corpus proceedings brought by Arthur Kelly and Nathaniel J. Jacobs, two State prisoners, have been heard together because they arise out of the same indictment and involve the same issues, namely, the legality of the arrests, the voluntariness of certain confessions or admissions, and the voluntariness of their respective pleas. Each petitioner has been represented by his own court-appointed counsel, and has been given the opportunity to present evidence or argument on any point he wished to raise.
On October 19, 1961, in the Criminal Court of Baltimore,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nathaniel J. Jacobs v. Warden, Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
- Quillien v. LeekeDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1969
- Kelly v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Smith & Solomon Trucking Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1966
- United States ex rel. Bolden v. RundleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969