Moody v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, Justice.
The plaintiff-appellant, Robert Moody (“Moody”), appeals from a July 16, 2009, judgment of the Superior Court whereby he was resentenced for violations of conditions of probation. Moody contends that his probation period had expired when he engaged in the conduct that violated his “alleged” probation. The record does not support that argument. Therefore, the judgment of the Superior Court must be affirmed.
Facts and Procedural History
In February, 2006, Moody was found guilty of Possession with Intent to Deliver a Controlled Substance and Possession of Ammunition by a Person…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Trump v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- Flamer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
- State v. SlomanSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Morgan v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
- Liket v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Levey v. Brownstone Asset Management, LPSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
- Lake v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014