Legal Opinion

Moody v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 29, 2010No. 418,2009PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice.

The plaintiff-appellant, Robert Moody (“Moody”), appeals from a July 16, 2009, judgment of the Superior Court whereby he was resentenced for violations of conditions of probation. Moody contends that his probation period had expired when he engaged in the conduct that violated his “alleged” probation. The record does not support that argument. Therefore, the judgment of the Superior Court must be affirmed.

Facts and Procedural History

In February, 2006, Moody was found guilty of Possession with Intent to Deliver a Controlled Substance and Possession of Ammunition by a Person…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Trump v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  2. Flamer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  3. State v. SlomanSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  4. Morgan v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  5. Liket v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Levey v. Brownstone Asset Management, LPSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
  2. Lake v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API