Legal Opinion

Utley v. Clements

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 2, 1900No. Nos. 11,910-(197)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action in the district court for Fillmore county against Joseph R. Clements and Maurice R. Todd, as surviving partners of a copartnership formerly existing between said defendants and Julia F. Greenleaf, since deceased, under the firm name of the Fillmore County Bank, to recover $24,292.75 with interest on certificates of deposit.

Read the full summary

Action in the district court for Fillmore county against Joseph R. Clements and Maurice R. Todd, as surviving partners of a copartnership formerly existing between said defendants and Julia F. Greenleaf, since deceased, under the firm name of the Fillmore County Bank, to recover $24,292.75 with interest on certificates of deposit. The case was tried before Kingsley, J., who found in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $25,708.03. From a judgment entered pursuant to the findings, defendant Clements appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

Counsel for defendant Clements fairly state this case in their brief, as follows:

“This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover of the defendants, Joseph R. Clements and Maurice R. Todd, as surviving partners of a copartnership previously existing between said defendants and one Julia F. Greenleaf, since deceased; said copartnership having conducted a general banking business at the village of Preston, in the county of Fillmore, and state of Minnesota, under the copartnership name of the Fillmore County Bank. Said co-partnership was formed in September, 1886; and the Fillmore County…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Watson v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ClementsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  2. State v. ClementsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  3. Clements v. UtleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API