Legal Opinion

Schnall v. AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 18, 2007No. 57523-6-IPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 — Appellants brought a class action lawsuit on behalf of all AT&T Wireless Services customers who were charged a “universal connectivity charge” (UCC) from 1998 through 2003. They allege that AT&T violated Washington’s Consumer Protection Act (CPA)1 by charging the fee without disclosing it in its advertisements; misleading its customers by categorizing it as a tax, surcharge, or regulatory fee; and breaching its customer contracts by raising the fee without notice. The trial court denied class certification on all of the appellants’ claims on two grounds: (1) the appellants were required…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  2. Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. Baby Neal v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  5. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Schnall v. AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Schnall v. AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. FutureSelect Portfolio Management, Inc. v. Tremont Group Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. Verzani v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  5. Carideo v. Dell, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API