Graybill & Bushong, Inc. v. Board of Finance & Revenue
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Cohen,
Graybill & Bushong, Inc. (appellant) is in the business of producing and selling animal and poultry feed. In connection with its activities it paid sales and use tax to its suppliers of electric service and machinery until August 23, 1961, when the Governor approved Act 491, P. L. 1092, of the 1961 Session of the General Assembly. Under this Act there was excluded from, tax items used in processing operations, and “processing” was defined to include “the preparation of animal feed or poultry feed for sale.” Furthermore, the exclusion was made retroactive to March…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hotel Casey Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Kaufman Construction Co. v. HolcombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Bell AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Keystone Raceway Corp. v. State Harness Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Board of Finance & RevenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Lilian v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Northern Tier Solid Waste Authority v. Commonwealth, Department of RevenueCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Eastern Diversified Metals Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Board of Finance & RevenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.