Legal Opinion

Lay v. Raymond

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 17, 2014No. 1012349CV; A152356PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, P. J.

In this partition action under ORS 105.205, plaintiff sought to partition a ranch property that she and defendant hold by a deed. The trial court concluded that, according to that deed, she and defendant hold the property as tenants in common in a life estate with cross-contingent remainders. The trial court determined that, as a result of that cotenancy, for a period of more than three years during which defendant excluded plaintiff from the property, plaintiff was entitled to a one-half share of the reasonable rental value for portions of the property, along with a one-half share of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Halleck v. HALLECKOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Hanns v. HannsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Church v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. Palmer v. ProtrkaOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Eagles Five, LLC v. LawtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kramer v. ConatserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  2. Kramer v. ConatserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API