Legal Opinion
Krance v. Chiaramonte
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 17, 2011PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Election Law § 6-134, which pertains to designating petitions, states, in pertinent part, “(10) [t]he provisions of this section shall be liberally construed, not inconsistent with substantial compliance thereto.” Here, the cover sheets of the designating petitions, as they related to Paul S. Chiaramonte (hereinafter the candidate), substantially complied with the requirements of the Election Law and the regulations of the New York State Board of Elections, to allow for the Rockland County Board of Elections (hereinafter the Board of Elections) to cumulatively count the signatures within the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pearse v. New York City Board of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Siems v. LiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Most v. WalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hayon v. GreenfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Balberg v. Board of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Balberg v. Board of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Hayon v. GreenfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Muhammed v. Board of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.