Legal Opinion
Most v. Walker
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 21, 2002PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*357Substantial compliance is acceptable as to details of form in a cover sheet to a designating petition. Here, the cover sheet as it related to Sam D. Walker substantially complied with the requirements of the Election Law and the regulations of the New York State Board of Elections (see Election Law § 6-134 [10]; 9 NYCRR 6215.6 [a]; see also Matter of Ardesia v Seidel, 242 AD2d 343; Matter of Fromson v Lefever, 112 AD2d 1064, 1065, affd sub nom. Matter of Barrett v Scaringe, 65 NY2d 946; Matter of Quintyne v Canary, 104 AD2d 473, 474). Santucci, J.P., Florio, O’Brien, Luciano and Mastro, JJ.,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fromson v. LefeverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Quintyne v. CanaryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Ardesia v. SeidelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pearse v. New York City Board of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Siems v. LiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Magelaner v. ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Krance v. ChiaramonteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Hayon v. GreenfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.