Urbano v. ZONING HEARING BOARD
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Crumlish, Jr.,
This appeal presents for consideration issues arising from the following incredible events:
1. A decision by the court below based upon no testimonial record at any stage of the proceedings.
2. The reopening of a zoning decision upon motion of the beneficiary of its decade long dormancy.
3. Injection into the confusion an obsolete pleading known as a Bill of Review in Equity.
As never before we find it imperative to trace the extraordinary history of this litigation before we attempt to apply the appropriate principles of law.
In April 1961, Roland Urbano, brother of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Zoning Hearing Board v. KonykCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Eitnier v. EREITZ CORP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Marchese v. Norristown Borough Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Lower Providence Township v. FordCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Bidwell v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Boulevard Land Corp. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Baird v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Harrisburg Gardens, Inc. v. Susquehanna Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Township of Upper Moreland v. GauntCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- City of Pittsburgh v. HermanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.