State v. Esquivel
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL M. SPINDEN, Judge.
Gregory Esquivel appeals the circuit court’s judgment convicting him of two counts of possessing a controlled substance, a Class C felony. Esquivel contends that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress because the evidence was seized in violation of § 544.193, RSMo 1994, and in violation of the “plain feel” doctrine. We affirm the circuit court’s judgment.
Esquivel does not dispute the sufficiency of the evidence. The evidence at the suppression hearing established that on March 3, 1996, Lieutenant William Chapman, a Sedalia police officer, arrested…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- State v. BurkhardtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Schmidt v. City of Bella VillaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- State v. TackettMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. ReedMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Jenkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Lamb v. HolmesKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.