Legal Opinion

Goldschmidt v. New York Steam Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1896PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, The Hew York Steam Company, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Hew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the -county of Hew York on the 16th day of April, 1896, as denies its motion to strike the cause from the Special Term calendar of the ¡Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Patterson, J.:

This action was placed upon the calendar of the Special Term of this court; the defendant moved to strike it from that calendar that it might be remitted to the calendar for the trial of jury issues the motion was denied, and from the order entered thereupon this appeal is taken. The defendant is a corporation organized under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Hew York, and is engaged in the business of supplying steam t'o various customers in the city of Hew York, who use such steam for the purposes of heating, cooking and motive power in dwelling houses or in other…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cogswell v. . N.Y., N.H. H.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Lefrois v. Monroe CountyNew York Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Miller v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  2. Expressway Realties v. Sidjack Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API