Legal Opinion

Expressway Realties v. Sidjack Realty Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1962PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBernard Newman, J.

Motion by defendant to transfer the action from the equity side of the court to the law side, so that defendant may have a trial by jury, is denied.

Defendant contends that this is an action for damages for nuisance, and under the provision of section 425 of the Civil Practice Act it is entitled to a trial by jury as of right.

The gravamen of the complaint is that the defendant (owner of the premises immediately adjacent to and contiguous with premises owmed by plaintiff) has reconstructed, filled in and caused to be graded all of its property in such a manner that the natural contour of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cogswell v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Miller v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. Goldschmidt v. New York Steam Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Adelstein v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Expressway Realties v. Sidjack Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  3. City of New York v. 114-25 Farmers BoulevardNew York Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API