Legal Opinion

Vogue v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 16, 2022No. SC20570Published

1Opinion of the Court

VOGUE v. ADMINISTRATOR, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION ACT (SC 20570) Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn, Ecker and Keller, Js. Syllabus The plaintiff employer, V Co., appealed to the trial court from the decision of the Employment Security Board of Review, which upheld the decision of an appeals referee of the Employment Security Appeals Division that a tattoo artist, S, was V Co.’s employee and that V Co. was liable under the Unemployment Compensation Act (§ 31-222 et seq.) for contributions to the state’s unemployment compensation fund based on S’s wages. V Co. leased retail…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Carpetland U.S.A., Inc. v. Illinois Department of Employment SecurityIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Athol Daily News v. Board of Review of the Division of Employment & TrainingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  3. Mattatuck Museum-Mattatuck Historical Society v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. Sebago v. Boston Cab Dispatch, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  5. Gerardo Vazquez v. Jan-Pro Franchising Int'l Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API