Legal Opinion
Cornell v. Nix
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 6, 1992No. 90-1195PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The suggestion for rehearing en banc is granted. The opinion and judgment of the panel, previously filed, are vacated. This case is set for oral argument before the Court en banc in St. Paul, Minnesota, on Monday, May 11, 1992.
The parties are invited, though not required, to file supplemental briefs, not to exceed 15 pages, the briefs to be filed simultaneously on or before April 20, 1992.
It is so ordered.
2Cited by42 opinions
- Michael Hoggard v. James Purkett, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Jack E. Alderman v. Walter D. ZantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Elbert Whaley Jones v. Gary Jerrison, Parole Officer Cranston Mitchell, Board of Probation and Parole and the Attorney General of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Thomas Henry Battle v. Paul K. DeloCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Anthony J. Larette v. Paul DeloCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.