Energy Management Corp. v. City of Shreveport
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CARL E. STEWART, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellant Energy Management Corporation (“EMC”) appeals the district court’s judgment on remand declaring City of Shreveport (“Shreveport”) Ordinance 221 “invalid” rather than “preempted.” EMC also challenges the district court’s refusal to award damages, attorney’s fees and costs. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand the judgment of the district court regarding the declaratory judgment language, holding that the prior panel intended Ordinance 221 be preempted by state law. We affirm the district court’s refusal to award damages and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Wilkinson v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Medina v. Ramsey Steel Co IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Hopwood v. State of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Dearmore v. City of GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Johnson v. Big Lots Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2009
- Byers v. Patterson, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2007
- LHC Nashua Partnership, Ltd. v. PDNED Sagamore Nashua, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Crystal Davis v. Credit Bureau of the SouthCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.