Legal Opinion

Pistone v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 1991No. A049965PublishedCited by 5 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SMITH, J.

We issued an order to show cause to review a summary adjudication granted in favor of real party in interest New Car Dealer Associates (NCDA), a defendant in this action brought by petitioner Glynis Pistone (Pistone) against NCDA and Diablo Leasing Company, doing business as Walnut Creek Nissan (Nissan), over defendants’ denial of claims Pistone made under a vehicle service contract (VSC) she entered into when purchasing a used car from Nissan. We conclude that triable issues of fact preclude summary adjudication and consequently issue a peremptory writ of mandate.

Background

Pis…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Tieberg v. Unemployment Ins. App. Bd.California Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Holy Spirit Ass'n for the Unification of World Christianity v. MolkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. AEG Live, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. McMullan v. Enterprise Financial Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  3. Software Design & Application, Ltd. v. Price WaterhouseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Akins v. Seterus, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2019
  5. In re Domain Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API