Legal Opinion

Matheson v. Hanna-Schoellkopf Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1903No. 57PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the Court

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

The facts upon which this proceeding for contempt are based were known to the petitioner more than four years before this attachment was-asked for, and, no sufficient excuse having been offered, I regard the delay as enough to justify me in refusing this motion. The injury done by the act complained of was peculiarly directed against the private right of the petitioner, and it was his duty to move promptly, instead of going on before the master, as if nothing important had happened. His neglect to take timely action leads me to believe that if the master had…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rowe v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1982
  2. Temco Manufacturing Co. v. National Electric Ticket Register Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Schumacher v. SchumacherWashington Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API