Legal Opinion
Toledo Typographical Union No. 63 v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 17, 1990No. 89-1481PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge D.H. GINSBURG.
D.H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judge:
Toledo Typographical Union No. 63 represents the composing room employees of the company that publishes the Toledo Blade, a daily newspaper. In negotiations over a new collective bargaining agreement (CBA), the Employer insisted upon the inclusion of a clause allowing it to deal directly with employees over retirement issues, and to exclude the Union from such individual negotiations; its purpose was to “buy out” the employees’ lifetime job guarantees upon the most favorable possible terms. The Union…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- National Labor Relations Board v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- J. I. Case Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- American Ship Building Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Pasco Police Officers' Ass'n v. City of PascoWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- McClatchy Newspapers, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Northern California Newspaper Guild, Local 52, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Crete Education Ass'n v. Saline County School District No. 76-0002Nebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- Service Employees International Union, AFL-CIO v. Labor Relations CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Colorado-Ute Electric Ass'n v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.