Legal Opinion

Buell v. United Firemen's Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 30, 1926No. 24,961PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDlBEEti, J.

Action on a policy of insurance against the theft of an automobile owned by the plaintiff Buell. He had bought it of the plaintiff Studebaker Sales Company on a conditional sales contract. The insurance was payable, as their interests might appear, to the Industrial Finance Corporation and the Studebaker company. These two companies and Buell were the plaintiffs. At the trial the case was dismissed without objection as to the finance corporation, its ' interest having ceased, and over objection as to the plaintiff Buell. There was a verdict for the defendant and against the plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Stewart-Warner Speedometer Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Philadelphia Underwriters v. Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  3. Bankers Joint Stock Land Bank v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. Cancilla v. Firemen's Fund Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ram Mutual Insurance Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. Magnolia Pipe Line Co. v. Security Union Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Empire Fire & Marine Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  4. New York Casualty Co. v. SazenskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  5. Collins Cadillac, Inc. v. Bigelow-Sanford, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API