Legal Opinion · Dissent

Norman E. Smith v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 7, 1959No. 14599_1Published

Wilbur K. Miller and Bastían, Circuit Judges, dissented.

1DissentBastian, Circuit Judge

I agree with the dissenting opinion of Judge MILLER, and think the following additional reasons indicate that the judgment of the District Court should be affirmed.

Even were it correct to treat appellant’s motion as one filed under § 2255— and for reasons set forth in Judge Miller’s opinion I do not think it should be so treated — the motion should be overruled.

The trial court held that the facts set forth in the motion were insufficient to warrant a finding that there might be probable cause to believe appellant had been mentally incompetent to stand trial, and also held that it was not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Price v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. United States v. SturmCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
  3. Charles H. Plummer, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  4. Randolph Turner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  5. Alexander Morris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API