Legal Opinion

(PC) Cole v. Soto

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 29, 2025No. 1:25-cv-00460Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KORRELL SANTANA COLE, No. 1:25-cv-00460 GSA (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY HIS APPLICATION TO 13 v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS SHOULD NOT BE DENIED AND THIS MATTER NOT 14 SOTO, et al., BE SUMMARILY DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST 15 Defendants. ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES 16 (ECF No. 7) 17 PLAINTIFF’S SHOWING OF CAUSE DUE IN FOURTEEN DAYS 18 19 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

and 20 has requested authority pursuant to

28…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Ross v. BlakeSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Rhodes v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API