Leitner & Brother v. Strickland
Supreme Court of Georgia
Trover. Description of property. Before Judge Ealligant. Effingham superior court. November term, 1891. Strickland filed his petition alleging that C. K. Leitner and 0. M. Leitner, partners composing the firm of O. K. Leitner & Brother, and doing business as said firm in that county, were in possession of certain hewn timber'and round logs, for his description of which see the head-note.
Read the full summary
Trover. Description of property. Before Judge Ealligant. Effingham superior court. November term, 1891. Strickland filed his petition alleging that C. K. Leitner and 0. M. Leitner, partners composing the firm of O. K. Leitner & Brother, and doing business as said firm in that county, were in possession of certain hewn timber'and round logs, for his description of which see the head-note. He further alleged that said firm and its members refused to deliver the timber and logs to him, or to pay him the value or the profits thereof (the amounts being alleged). Attached to the declaration was an…
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed,-
Strickland filed his petition alleging that C. K. Leitner and 0. M. Leitner, partners composing the firm of O. K. Leitner & Brother, and doing business as said firm in that county, were in possession of certain hewn timber'and round logs, for his description of which see the head-note. He further alleged that said firm and its members refused to deliver the timber and logs to him, or to pay him the value or the profits thereof (the amounts being alleged). Attached to the declaration was an affadavitto hold to bail. A demurrer was interposed by defendants, and after argument…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Gatlin v. Matthews & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Head v. Pollard Lumber Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Pepper v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Redd & Co. v. Lathem & SonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Stipe v. WillinghamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928