Ermini v. Scott
District Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN E. STEELE, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter comes before the Court on defendants William Murphy, Mike Scott, Robert Hamer, Richard Lisenbee, and Charlene Palmese’s' Motions for Summary *1260Judgment (Docs. ##56, 56, 59) filed on January 19 and 20, 2017. Plaintiff filed responses (Docs. #63 1 64, 65) on February 6, 2017. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants William Murphy, Robert Hamer, Richard Lisenbee, and Charlene Palmese’s motions are granted and Defendant Mike Scott’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I
Summary judgment is appropriate only…
2Cases cited98 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Davis v. City of ApopkaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2018
- Hall v. RhodenDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025
- Hyde v. BowmanDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2023
- Palmer v. RobbinsDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2021
- SHULLAW v. MCMULLENDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.