Legal Opinion

Twyman v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 1952No. 7 Div. 71PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Presiding Judge.

In the court below the accused was convicted of grand larceny. The indictment under which he was prosecuted charged the offense o'f robbery.

The defendant was duly arraigned under the provisions of Title 30, Sec. 63, Code 1940.

The venire consisted of the names of 60 regular jurors and 40 special jurors.

The names of D. B. Curry and W. A. Hurst each appeared twice on the venire. The record discloses that these were not different persons with the same name, but were in fact' duplications.

The striking list contained 58 names and the indicated duplications appeared thereon.

*454Appe…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Evans v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Bridges v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Irwin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. McNutt v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Twyman v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API