Porath v. Village of Highland Park
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Mandell (Henry A.), J. Assumpsit by Julius Porath against the village of Highland Park upon a paving contract. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.
Early in 1914 defendant submitted plans and specifications for bids for the construction of a sewer extending across the village from north to south on Oakland avenue, a distance of .8,530 feet. Plaintiff’s bid was accepted and a contract made with him on June 24, 1914, with the plans and specifications made a part thereof. The contract called for a 48-inch sewer for about one-half of the distance, a 42-inch sewer for one-quarter of the distance, and for the remainder a 36-inch sewer, the entire sewer to be constructed of vitrified segment block. Plaintiff proceeded with the work and by the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jamieson v. Kings County Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
- People v. HolmesMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Schliess v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Lamson v. City of MarshallMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Boots v. SeinbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- L. W. Kinnear, Inc. v. City of Lincoln ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1932