Legal Opinion
L. W. Kinnear, Inc. v. City of Lincoln Park
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided October 3, 1932No. Docket No. 172, Calendar No. 36,249PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.
In August, 1926, plaintiff, a Michigan corporation, entered into a contract with defendants for the construction of. 15,000 feet of lateral and trunk line sewer. Claiming performance of its contract, plaintiff brought this suit to recover a claimed unpaid balance on the contract price of $5,938.20; also to recover $9,854.74 which plaintiff claims is due it because defendant changed the method of operation in constructing the sewer from that contemplated when the contract was signed to a more expensive method of installation claimed to have been ordered by defendants’ engineer; and to recover…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- MacKnight Flintic Stone Co. v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Filbert v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Coit v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Bentley v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McCree & Company v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- City of Pontiac v. DucharmeMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- American LaFrance & Foamite Industries, Inc. v. Village of CliffordMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Diponio v. City of Garden CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- A. J. Smith Construction Co. v. City of Marine CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.