Legal Opinion

Morton v. Dormont Borough

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1939No. Appeal, 93PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

The borough constructed two sewers, one in Arkansas Avenue and the other in Eastmont Avenue, to receive and carry away surface water, the first draining an area of about 100 acres and the second a somewhat larger area. The sewers are constructed of concrete or cement pipes, one being 4 feet in diameter and the other 2% feet; they end at the borough line and discharge into plaintiffs’ farm which abuts on the boundaries of the borough. This farm lies lower than the borough and prior to the action of the borough, had two small grass-grown ditches, 6 to 8 inches deep,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kauffman v. GriesemerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
  2. Strauss v. AllentownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  3. Pfeiffer v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  4. Miller v. LaubachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1864
  5. Meixell v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Chamberlin v. CiaffoniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Rau v. Wilden Acres, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Laform v. Bethlehem TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Leiper v. Heywood-Hall Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Piekarski v. Club Overlook Estates, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API