Legal Opinion
In re Armell N.
New York City Family Court
Decided May 24, 2010PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Lee H. Elkins, J.
This matter is before the court for decision following fact-finding. The respondent is charged with obstructing governmental administration (Penal Law § 195.05), resisting arrest (Penal Law § 205.30) and menacing in the third degree (Penal Law § 120.15).
Evidence at fact-finding established that on June 11, 2009, at about 11:00 a.m., New York City Transit Police Officers Santi and Cruz evicted the 15-year-old respondent Armell N. first from the A train, and then from the transit system. The officers testified that as they entered the A train at the Borough…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. CaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. TodaroNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- People v. MunafoNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Matter of Davan L.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
- In re Shannon B.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mediavilla v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016