Legal Opinion
Diorio v. Bragan
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided January 26, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreco, J.
This is an action to recover for the defendants’ alleged G.L.c. 93A unfair and deceptive acts and conversion of equipment leased to defendant Alice A. Bragan (“Bragan”) and used by her in a restaurant she had operated on property owned by defendant Kenneth A. Grunst (“Grunsf’). A default judgment was entered against Bragan. After trial, judgment was entered in favor of Grunst. The plaintiff has appealed pursuant to Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A., Rule 8C.
The only two witnesses at trial were the plaintiff, Ronald J. Diorio (“Diorio”), and defendant Grunst. After hearing their testimony, the trial…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Cook v. KozlowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
- Macoviak v. Chase Home Mortgage Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
- Marshall Vessels, Inc. v. WrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
- Fine Home Builders, Inc. v. HumennMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Campbell v. TonerMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2006
- Boehm v. Arbella Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2003
- DeVito Auto Restoration v. CardMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
- Commonwealth Mutual Insurance v. VigoritoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2003
- Moore Real Estate Trust v. Din-DayalMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2006