Legal Opinion

Moore Real Estate Trust v. Din-Dayal

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided July 31, 2006Published

1Opinion of the CourtCoven, J.

After a jury-waived trial of this “no-fault” summary process action, the defendant-tenant has appealed the judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff both for possession and on the defendant’s counterclaims for unlawful discrimination and retaliation.

We address at the outset three preliminary procedural arguments advanced by the defendant-tenant She contends that 1. the action was improperly brought in the name of Moore Real Estate Trust because only the trustees of the property could maintain the action; 2. the plaintiff failed to identify the true grounds for terminating her tenancy as…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Wheelock College v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Dacey v. Connecticut Bar Assn.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  4. Attorney General v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  5. Cruz Management Co. v. ThomasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API