People v. Harold Johnson
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
In the first phase of a bifurcated trial for a charge of driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor, third violation, conducted pursuant to MCL 257.625; MSA 9.2325, must the trial court, on request of counsel, instruct the jury on the lesser included offense of the misdemeanor of driving while visibly impaired, MCL 257.625b; MSA 9.2325(2), which carries a maximum penalty of 90 days, or is such requested instruction precluded by People v Chamblis, 395 Mich 408, 429; 236 NW2d 473 (1975)? In the second phase of such a trial is it sufficient if the prosecution offers certified copies of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. HamptonMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. ChamblisMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. LambertMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. CovingtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. StephensMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. RaisanenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. LeonowiczMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. TabarMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984