Legal Opinion

People v. Harold Johnson

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1980No. Docket 45033PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In the first phase of a bifurcated trial for a charge of driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor, third violation, conducted pursuant to MCL 257.625; MSA 9.2325, must the trial court, on request of counsel, instruct the jury on the lesser included offense of the misdemeanor of driving while visibly impaired, MCL 257.625b; MSA 9.2325(2), which carries a maximum penalty of 90 days, or is such requested instruction precluded by People v Chamblis, 395 Mich 408, 429; 236 NW2d 473 (1975)? In the second phase of such a trial is it sufficient if the prosecution offers certified copies of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. HamptonMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. ChamblisMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. People v. LambertMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  4. People v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  5. People v. CovingtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. StephensMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. RaisanenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. LeonowiczMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. People v. TabarMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API