Legal Opinion

Torrance v. King County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1998No. 66088-3PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

We are asked to determine whether a superior court can issue a constitutional writ of certiorari when a county makes a decision not to redesignate property from agricultural to commercial or industrial and the landowner does not exhaust all appeals. In this case, we conclude the superior court cannot, and reverse the decision of the lower court.

*785The controversy surrounds 25 acres of property zoned agricultural in King County, outside the Kent city limits, but inside Kent’s annexation area. The property had been zoned agricultural since 1941, but Torrance acquired the property in the 1960s in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. Seattle School District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Saldin Securities, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Saldin Securities, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Thomsen v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. James v. County of KitsapWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. James v. Kitsap CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Brinnon Group v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  4. Davidson Serles & Associates v. City of KirklandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. Stafne v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API