Legal Opinion

Garfield v. Kirk

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1873PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL, by the defendant, from a judgment entered upon the report of a refereee.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Mullin, P. J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff, an attorney and counsellor of this court, to recover for services rendered for the defendant as such.

The defences were: 1. A general denial; 2. Payment for the said services; and, 3. A counter-claim for money *466paid, property sold and delivered to the plaintiff, and money lent and advanced.

The issues were referred to a referee, who ordered judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $3,337.68. From that judgment the defendant appeals.

There are a great number of exceptions taken by the defendant to the reception and rejection of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Erben v. . LorillardNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Beekman v. PlatnerNew York Supreme Court · 1853
  3. Lewis v. TrickeyNew York Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gorman v. BaniganSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1900
  2. Newman v. ErnstSuperior Court of Buffalo · 1890
  3. People v. Bond Street Savings BankNew York Supreme Court · 1881
  4. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of the of the Estate of OgdenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1903
  5. In re Ogden's EstateNew York Surrogate's Court · 1903

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API