Legal Opinion
Baneky v. Apfel
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 20, 1998No. 96 CIV. 7419 LAKPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KAPLAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Robert Baneky brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) challenging the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his application for disability insurance benefits. The Commissioner denied the application on the ground that plaintiff neither suffered from an impairment listed in the regulations, nor an equivalent impairment, nor lacked the residual functional capacity to perform his past relevant work.
Pending before the Court are plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Elmer G. Berry v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Edwind F. PRATTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Cora Mae WARREN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stephens v. ColvinDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2016
- Gorecki v. MassanariDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Antonetti v. BarnhartDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2005
- Grant v. BerryhillDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020