Legal Opinion
Triplex Safety Glass Co. v. Latchum
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 23, 1942No. Civ. 197PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, W., Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff taxpayer is suing for a refund on the payment of taxes assessed against it for the year 1937. The litigation is centered about the payment of $1,012,191.08 by the Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. and Duplate Corp. to the plaintiff on July 29, 1937, on account of a patent infringement. The infringement action was begun in 1928 and although the first interlocutory decree of the District Court, holding that Pittsburgh had infringed upon plaintiff’s patent was entered on December 5, 1931, the amount of damage was not definitely fixed until $1,012,191.08 was paid on…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- North American Oil Consolidated v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Lucas v. American Code Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Woolford Realty Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Helvering v. Morgan's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Arthur Kurlan and Marilyn Kurlan v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Arthur Kurlan and Marilyn KurlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Blake v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1976
- Lark Sales Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Blake v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1976
- Lark Sales Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.