Legal Opinion
Carol Ege v. Joan Yukins, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 24, 2007No. 05-2078PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J., joined by Oliver, D.J.,
BOGGS, C.J. (pp. 380-88), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
OPINION
BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge.
On July 22, 2005, the district court granted Carol Ege’s petition for a condi*367tional writ of habeas corpus on grounds that (1) admission of bite-mark evidence at Ege’s state trial violated her right under the Due Process Clause to a fair trial, and (2) the performance of Ege’s state trial counsel was unconstitutionally deficient and caused her actual prejudice. The State appeals the district court judgment on both grounds, and argues additionally that Ege’s habeas petition is…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Stewart v. ErwinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Hall v. VasbinderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Girts v. YanaiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Douglas Stewart v. O'Bell "Tom" WinnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Carter v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.