Legal Opinion
Ruth Hill Frederick v. Eric K. Shinseki
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided March 11, 2011No. 09-0433PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KASOLD, Chief Judge:
Mrs. Ruth Hill Frederick is the remarried surviving spouse of World War II veteran Fred T. Hill. She appeals through counsel a November 19, 2008, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) that denied restoration of dependency and indemnity compensation (DIC) because she did not file an application for DIC within one year from the date of the enactment of Public Law 108-183 (Public Law), much of which is codified at 38 U.S.C. § 103(d)(2)(B) (2003). Mrs. Frederick essentially argues that the requirement for applying for DIC within one year of enactment of the Public…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Frederick v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Marvin O. Johnson v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2013
- Terrance D. Massie v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2011
- Eric J. Stewart v. Robert L. WilkieUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2018
- Frederick v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.